The Writing Company · with the Mayor

Write to Persuade

1 Learn Start here

2 Assess Take the quiz

3 Practice Try it out

4 Create Make your own

★ Certified Earn your badge

Write to Persuade

When you persuade, your reader starts on the other side of the river. They do not believe you yet, and they have a case of their own. That is why you build.

An argument is a bridge you build for a reader who starts on the other side. Here is what holds it up, what each part does, and the move this grade adds: you meet the other side head on.

A claim that spans the river

Say what you believe, plainly, in one sentence. The reader should know exactly where you want to take them before you build a thing.
Reasons that are the pillars

At least three. Ask of each one: will my reader believe this? A reason that only convinces people already on your bank is not a pillar.
A footing of proof under every pillar, and an honest answer to the other side

Back each reason with one more sentence: an example, a fact, or what would happen without it. Proof is what carries a doubter's weight. Then, at this grade, do the braver thing: name the strongest objection your reader would raise, grant what is genuinely fair in it, and show why your claim still stands anyway. Concede, then rebut. An objection you answer honestly makes your bridge stronger, not weaker, because the reader sees you already thought of theirs.
A far bank with a signpost

End by returning to what you believe, and tell the reader what to do once they are across. An argument is a conversation with a reader who is allowed to push back.

Spend your tools

The craft moves you already know still do the work, pointed at an argument.

Nelson · Specific nouns

Two nouns can point at the same thing and FEEL different. "Place" is flat; "shelter" carries care. "Animals" is neutral; "strays" carries the loss. That extra feeling a word carries is its connotation, and choosing it on purpose is real power. Nelson would want the exact one.

The animals at the place needed homes. The strays at the shelter needed homes.

The Mayor · Voice

Voice is more than tone; it carries your STANCE, where you stand on what you are writing about. The flat report hides you; "I used to judge, and a season taught me better" tells the reader who is speaking and what they have come to believe. Slang always knows where he stands, and so should your writing.

This report describes why pets are surrendered. I used to judge families who gave up a pet. A season at the shelter taught me better.

Connie · Clause control and subordination

When two ideas share a sentence, one can lead and one can follow. Tuck the lesser idea into a subordinate clause ("where I learned...") so the main idea ("changed me") carries the weight. Model the commas around the clause; that is the rule. Connie can join clauses, but you decide which one leads.

I volunteered at the shelter. I learned why pets get returned. It changed me. Volunteering at the shelter, where I learned why pets get returned, changed me.

The Mayor · Introduction and conclusion craft

The opening and the close do the heaviest lifting. A strong introduction earns the reader's attention with a real moment, not "this is about." A strong conclusion does more than stop; it hands the reader the meaning. Craft both ends, and the middle is trusted.

This is about the shelter. In conclusion, pets matter. The third time I saw his name on the whiteboard, I understood the problem. So before a family adopts, one honest hour could change a life, his and theirs.

The Persuade Plan

Same three moves as always, one more trip. When you persuade, the Plan it move is the Bridge.

The Mayor's Power Plan

Pick it. Choose the belief worth arguing, and know who is standing on the far bank.
Plan it. Set your pillars and their footings before you write.
Pour it on. Write, and keep asking: would this pillar hold my reader's weight?

The Bridge

A bridge stands because the pillars hold the span and the footings hold the pillars.

Your claim spans the river: say what you believe, plainly.
Your reasons are the pillars: at least three the reader will believe.
Every pillar needs a footing of proof: an example, a fact, or a what-if.
The far bank: return to your claim and tell the reader what to do.

Watch the Mayor plan it

Watch me build a bridge from that same season at the animal shelter. My claim: families should take a short class, or foster first, before adopting a pet.

Pick it. Families should take a short class, or foster first, before adopting a pet. I believe it, I can back it, and I spent a summer watching what happens when they do not.

Plan it.

My claim, spanning the river Families should take a short class, or foster first, before adopting a pet.
My pillars (three reasons) 1. Most returns come from surprises the family could have seen coming. 2. A short class or a foster trial matches the right pet to the right household before anyone gets hurt. 3. Preparation is far cheaper, for the family and the pet, than a failed adoption.
The footings (proof under each) 1. The shelter's fact sheet listed unmet exercise needs and unexpected behavior as leading causes, and the manager told me most behavior returns come in the first two weeks. 2. When Priya started walking every adopter through what their chosen pet actually needed, the second-return rate on our row dropped. 3. One boxer mix on our row was adopted and returned twice before a prepared adopter kept him, and every failed trip cost the shelter and cost the dog.
The far bank A season on the kennel row convinced me that one honest hour up front prevents a second surrender. Ask your local shelter about a pre-adoption class or a foster-to-adopt trial before you bring a pet home.

Pour it on. When I draft this, each pillar and its footing becomes its own little paragraph, and I keep asking the bridge question as I go: will this pillar hold my reader's weight? Then I do the move this grade demands. I walk out to meet the strongest objection. Some readers will say a required class adds a barrier that keeps pets in the shelter longer, and that is a real cost, not a silly one, so I grant it plainly. But then I rebut: the return rate shows that an unprepared adoption is its own delay. A pet that comes right back has lost weeks and started over, and one honest hour prevents a second surrender. Conceding the fair point does not sink my bridge. It shows the reader I built it knowing their objection was standing there. An argument is a conversation with a reader who is allowed to say "prove it," and "but what about", and a strong one answers both.

Start the quiz →